Why, you might ask, is the coauthor of a book about InDesign reviewing a direct competitor, Affinity Publisher?
Because it’s new and I wanted to check it out.
And because it’s so much more affordable than Adobe’s Creative Cloud: $600 a year for the Adobe suite vs. a one-time total of $150 for the full line of Serif’s products: Publisher, Photo, and Designer (all at half price until May 20). We both bought the Affinity software for desktop, and I must say that for the most part, we love it.
The Affinity Publisher app is for desktop use on PCs and Macs. Photo and Designer can also now be used on iPads, so check back on Publisher to see when the iPad version becomes available.
My method in trying out Affinity Publisher was to go through Book Design Made Simple and see whether I could accomplish all the book design and typesetting tasks we give you in the book.
And the answer is: Yes, almost.
And does Publisher have any extra features that might be useful to a book designer? Yes, definitely.
Are you considering trying the new #bookdesign software called Affinity Publisher? We've reviewed it for you and offer a few tips to get you started quickly. https://bit.ly/2YSC33L. Click To TweetSo here you’ll get the straight scoop on what’s good, what’s not so good, and what’s absolutely terrific about Affinity Publisher—from the point of view of a book designer and as it relates to Book Design Made Simple. I purposely have not read any other reviews of Publisher; these observations are my own.
What’s good about Affinity Publisher
Just so we’re clear what we’re talking about here: Affinity Publisher is the equivalent of Adobe InDesign, and you can open and edit .idml files. Affinity Designer is the equivalent of Adobe Illustrator, and you can open and edit .ai files. Affinity Photo is the equivalent of Adobe Photoshop, and you can open and edit .psd files.
The best thing about Publisher is that you’ll be able to accomplish almost anything you’re used to doing in InDesign. But you’ll have to search a bit on the screen at first, and learn a few new terms. For instance, the Control panel is called the Context tool bar. If you use a Library in InDesign, instead you’ll find a very convenient Assets panel. Hidden characters are easily accessible but are called Special Characters.
Be aware that there are dozens of helpful tutorial videos for Publisher (more are being added), plus many others for Photo and Designer. I’d very much like to get my hands on a printed manual for Publisher, but it’s not available yet.
Also—and this is very important—if you install all three applications, you’ll be able to work on your photos and illustrations without switching out to the other programs, as they are all so fully integrated that they are simply called “personas.”
Here’s a list of some of the more important features and actions that you’ll encounter:
- Importing InDesign files. Okay, call me crazy, but when I opened an InDesign .idml file in Publisher, it appeared so beautifully and so close to perfectly that I actually jumped out of my seat and started dancing around. (However, if the fonts had been leased from Adobe, they would probably not have imported.)
- User interface. Take a peek (below). Does this look like something you’ve seen before? If you have any experience with InDesign, you’ll notice right away the Context tool bar (Control panel) at the top and flyout panels on the right, a Pages panel on the left, and several other familiar-looking features.
This is a new document, with the Pages panel on the left. It all looks incredibly familiar, doesn’t it? Notice the three little colored squares at the upper left corner. They represent the Affinity Publisher, Designer, and Photo personas, and switching among them involves just a single click.
- Preferences and Document Setup. Some of the items that you’d find elsewhere in InDesign are in Publisher’s Preferences panel instead, and vice versa. For example, Document Setup (rather than Preferences) is where you’ll choose your units of measurement. And some of the choices are located in Spread Setup. As far as I can tell, everything you’d need is there—somewhere.
- Importing and placing text. This works almost exactly the same as in InDesign, including text autoflow. There’s only one minor glitch involving typographer’s (curly) quotes. (See “What’s not so good” below for details).
-
The Object Styles panel in Publisher looks nothing like the one in InDesign.
Styles. There are character, paragraph, and object styles (see right) with all the familiar attributes. You’ll find lots of styles already listed and defined for you, but you can change them in every way and add your own. Use Affinity Publisher Help if you get confused.
- Master pages. Yes, they’re included and work as you’d expect.
- Typefaces. You’ll need to purchase your own fonts; no more leasing from Adobe. When you highlight some copy and you want to change the typeface, move your mouse up and down your list of fonts and the highlighted copy changes to each one you roll over. It’s entertaining!
- Colors, swatches, and gradients. These work almost the same as in InDesign and are very easy to figure out.
- Hyperlinks. Yes, you can create them, of course. The procedure requires a little extra clicking around, but there’s a tutorial for that.
- Section Manager. It is well worth your while to learn to use the Section Manager. This is where you add changing running heads (text variables) and is very clever indeed.
- Merge documents. This is equivalent to InDesign’s Book feature and purports to work more or less the same way. I did not try it.
- Indexing. This feature works very well and includes a handy panel on the left that shows all your entries. You can find, add, or delete entries right inside the panel either before or after you’ve added the index on the page.
- Automatic table of contents. First watch the tutorial, and then it works like a charm.
- Producing PDFs. PDFs are generated pretty much the same way as in InDesign, with professional results, as far as I can tell.
What’s not so good about Affinity Publisher
A few nifty features that we use happily in InDesign seem to be missing at the moment from Publisher, or they work so differently that you’ll need to relearn them.
- Purchasing fonts. If you’re used to relying on Adobe’s Typekit, you’re going to be a bit perplexed at first. (“What?!?! I have to pay for typefaces?”) This doesn’t bother me at all, and you might also discover that shopping for them is one of life’s little pleasures.
- Importing text from Word. In general, all your text will come in just fine, but if your Word doc has straight quotation marks, you can’t change them to curly (typographer’s) quotes with just one click as you import. Your best bet is to change them in Word (it’s very easy) ahead of time. For our own detailed instructions on how to change quotation marks either before or after you place your text, click here.
- Layers. I am still struggling with the Layers panel. It works sort of like the layers in Photoshop, so that every time I add anything to the document it appears on its own separate layer. Once I get accustomed to it I’ll be fine, and I hope you will, too. In the meantime, I’m learning not to drag anything up or down on the Layers panel, as that only wreaks havoc. I must use the Layers menu instead (Layer > Arrange > Move to Front [or Back, etc.] ).
- Strokes. Stroke styles are limited to solid and dashed—no double strokes, dots, or wavy lines. However, you can customize the dashed lines, just as in Adobe Illustrator. So with strokes, some things have been taken away but replaced with a precision dashed line feature, which also means you can devise a custom dotted line with a little extra effort.
What’s absolutely terrific about Affinity Publisher
The price. I can’t stress it enough: Affinity Publisher is very inexpensive compared to the Adobe subscription, and even much, much less than buying Adobe products before a subscription was required. Even with a few minor missing features, it is completely worth buying and hanging on to. And until May 20, 2020, Serif is offering all three apps for half price. Updates are free.- The shape drawing tools. Look at the choices (right)! This is going to be so much fun.
- The Crop Tool. Finally, finally, you can crop your geometry shapes right inside the program. Here’s an example below. I grouped the rectangle and the jagged line on the left, selected the Crop tool, then shaped the crop frame the way I wanted it. Is this not completely cool?
The original green shape and yellow line (left) and the cropped version.
- Switching among the Affinity “personas.” If you’re in Publisher and you decide to use a brush tool, simply click on the Designer icon at the top left corner of the screen, and your very same workspace loses the Publisher tools and gains the Designer tools. Ditto with the Photo persona. When you’re done, just switch back; it could not be any easier.
- The type menu. As I mentioned above, if you highlight some text and then roll over the list of fonts, the selected text will change as you move up and down the list. The same thing happens to a paragraph if you roll over the paragraph styles list.
- The Artistic Text Tool. This is like a dance party for type geeks! Just select the “A” tool and type something, then resize the text frame at random and you’ll watch the type shrink and grow to fit. Next, roll over your font list and the font will change accordingly, too.
Is it any wonder that Affinity Publisher was the official Mac App of the Year for 2019? We encourage you to try it, using the current 90-day free trial version if you like. Watch the tutorials, try their instructions, and you’ll soon feel like a Publisher pro.
I do believe that, with patience, you could use Affinity Publisher with Book Design Made Simple as your guide and successfully design your first or hundredth book.
Read more: InDesign object styles » works in general with Affinity object styles, too.
Read more: Using a layout grid in book design » demonstrates how to keep your design under control (and thus more attractive).
Read more: Your book promotion materials » suggests many more uses for Publisher.
Book Design Made Simple. You can do it yourself.
Thanks for your review – I just came across it. You confirmed my feelings plus taught me a few new things about Publisher too. A few years ago I tried Publisher1 and it was not nice, so I had to haul out my old Mac that still ran InDesign CS6 (the last one before subscriptions) to lay out a 185 page book. A new project last fall brought me once again to Serif and its revised Publisher 2.0. What a difference. I still felt that I might be missing some inDesign secret sauces but your review helped set aside that uncertainty.
Actually, I did that review of Publisher 1 and never bought v2. I’m retired now and don’t have as much need for layout programs. Though Fiona and I used the subscription version while producing Book Design Made Simple (which we wrote in ID), we reverted back to CS 5.5 after retiring. Publisher is definitely missing some small but very nice InDesign features, but I managed to produce a 250-page book with it last year without any trouble.
Anyway, whichever program you use, we both wish you the best in design success.
Glenna
P.S. I love your email name of OldSchoolLayout.
I too am retired. I started in graphic arts (yes I do remember pasting up typesetting galleys) but spent most of my career on the editorial side. Without commercial deadline pressures I’m finding layout and design quite engaging.
I had the pleasure of interviewing John Warnock during the period when Adobe’s type foundry was facing competition from the likes of Corel with its “100 fonts for $99” pitches. I asked him why anyone would would buy Adobe typefaces in the face of cheap but almost-as-good knock-offs. He said something to the effect that those that know the artistry of a well-designed typeface would know the difference, and they were his customers.
I think inDesign and PageMaker before it were in that orbit, really trying to put words on an equal footing with pictures in aesthetic presentation. Still not sure if Publisher2 reaches those typographic heights, but I’ve been impressed.
Thank you for this article.
I tried the Publisher 2 : exciting. It seems to me that only one thing is missing for optimal typographic quality: the Adobe paragraph composer. Is there a similar feature in Publisher that replaces the one in InDesign and is a must for any composer?
Hi,
We have not upgraded to version 2. In version 1 there doesn’t seem to be anything similar to the paragraph composer, but I have had no problems with poorly spaced paragraphs as long as I kept an eye on it. Still, you get an awful lot for the price of Publisher (and no annoying subscription).
Glenna
To date a lot has changed and Serif has updated all three of its major programs to Version 2. I’ve bought them and they now include Foot/End Notes and a Book facility as PagePlus X9 used to have. This does change the situation very makedly and brings Publisher much closer to the usability of InDesign.
Most book producers will be happy to use this program now.
I still regret not having the facility of a separate Editor as all the traditional DTP programs used to have but I guess I can live without it, there are many other features that are worth having.
Hello John,
Thanks for letting us know about the terrific improvements in Publisher. Though we have stuck with version 1 for now, it’s good to know what we could look forward to if we upgraded.
Glenna
Thank you for writing this article. I’ve been on the fence but now I’m all in. As always, Fiona, ever since I started Longfeather with my Dad years ago, you’ve been incredibly generous with your time and wisdom. Lots of appreciation beaming your way.
Erik, how nice to hear from you! I’ve appreciated our connection over the years too.
All the best, Fiona
Hello .
Can you kindly put me through the method of converting an svg image into a connect the dot diagram.
Thank you
Hello Taniaa,
I’m sorry, but we have no idea at all how to go about this. I hope you can find instructions online somewhere else.
Glenna
Hello Glenna! (and Fiona)
I’ve not actually designed a book before and am having my first meeting with the customer tomorrow
While doing a search for how to go about designing and self-publishing a book I’ve just come across your website this morning – and what a treasure trove it is! So clear and well thought through.
I’m so pleased that the Affinity Suite is becoming better known and that you have given it such a glowing review. I couldn’t agree more with your findings
I started off with Aldus Pagemaker, then tried Quark Express alongside it (those were the days!) Then Adobe took over Pagemaker, created Adobe CS (Creative Suite) and saw Quark off when the latter became far too expensive (and bloated for the puny computers of the day). So I went with Adobe. UNTIL the company, in its wisdom, brought in the monthly subscription business model which freelance sole traders like me found increasingly difficult to justify economically. After some searching, comparing and dithering I finally discovered Affinity during Covid at half price special offer – and would NEVER go back to Adobe. Even at full price the Affinity Suite would be worth every penny. It’s like discovering the sunny uplands of digital design at an affordable price
I do hope you will make future videos about Affinity as you explore it further. I’m aware there must be a whole world to discover and I’m learning all the time. I only hope they don’t bring in the monthly subscription …
Thankyou both again for your wonderful website and tutorials
PS I’ve just signed up to join your community to learn more
Hello Linda,
Thanks for your note! I took the same winding journey through all the applications, finally landing on InDesign for long enough to write our book with Fiona. We both kept the very annoying and expensive Adobe subscription until we finished the second edition of our book but then we went back to v 5.5, which we luckily were both able to hang onto.
We write 99.9% of our blog posts about InDesign because that’s the application that our book is about. The one about Publisher was a fluke! But now that I’m retired, and since I went to the trouble of learning Publisher, that’s what I use most of the time when a volunteer project comes up. I am finding that there are some features from ID that I really miss, but still, for the price (I got mine for half price, too), it can’t be beat.
Good luck with your project.
Glenna
Over 20 years ago I did an engineering hand book in Pagemaker 5.0. Equations were imported as graphics, I didn’t want to learn Tex or LaTex. For about 10 years, I’ve used Scribus for a news letter. Basic newspaper layout -nothing artsy. Very competent at tables, importing photos, setting styles for headers, subheaders, body text, sports result lists, etc.
I was going to use Scribus to redo the engineering book, but learned that it handles subscripted variables and Greek letters within the text extremely poorly. Imagine having to insert a “glyph” instead of selecting symbol font. Imagine that when you make any change to a paragraph style the glyph is deleted. Similar problem with subscripts. Make any change to a paragraph style, and the subscripts become not subscripts. After seeing the Affinity webpage think I should clarify, when I say “paragraph style” I don’t mean artist shaping along a curve with pink letters and zebra skin back ground. I’m taking about setting tabs and indents. Things one normally expects to have no effect on subscripts.
I didn’t didn’t see the option to try before I buy, but I guess $54 is worth taking a chance. Maybe I’ll have to then put my own review online on how well it handles doing an engineering book.
Good luck, Ray, with Publisher. You will find that it’s rather similar to Pagemaker, so I hope you’ll catch on quickly.
Affinity used to offer a free trial period, but I guess that’s gone for now. You’ll probably find that Publisher will do the job well.
Glenna
Update:
I’m getting used to Affinity Publisher after at least half a dozen times of thinking I was going to give up. The support forum is outstanding. My book is very math intensive so lots of subscripts and exponents in the text -not just in the equations which I pull in as raster images. Very handy keyboard shortcuts for those. Like all my text books from 40 years ago, and the textbooks bought in the last year, I am using a ten point font with subscripts around 6.6 point. Unfortunately, the subscripts are scaled which means they don’t just get shorter, they get proportionally thinner. This makes them look wrong compared to books that use Tex or Latex, where subscripts and exponents keep more of their line thickness when shortened. I don’t know that buying a font would fix this issue. I make due by putting all subscripts and exponents in bold and that prints well. Subscripts don’t look bold, they just look right. Or at least look more like the professional books by Wiley, McGraw Hill, and Houghton Mifflin where they have a more sophisticated way of handling subscripts and superscripts.
I find the interface for Affinity to be odd. One example: It’s good that I can save my print preferences -there are a lot of settings. Unfortunately, within those preferences I can’t change the default “print all spreads” to a default of “print all pages”. So sometimes when I miss that, my print jobs come out as two little facing pages printed on one 8.5×11″ page -printed as a spread, just like the menu says. I can see where the user base of Affinity may be more likely to want to print spreads. But I don’t understand why I can’t change this default as part of the other print preferences I set. This is a time and material wasting gotcha if I don’t remember to change the setting every single time I print. To a much lesser extent, it is odd to have a setting that says “print all pages” or “print all spreads”, and then below it I choose particular pages to print. Literally contradicting instructions. Maybe the English wording should be “print AS spreads” and “print AS pages”. Yeah, that’s a minor thing, but not being able to set the default to NOT print as spreads is a frequent annoyance.
I am finding many of the things I thought were odd aren’t so bad once I get used to them, and often result in a better work flow than what I previously used. I am happy that I can change a paragraph style to adjust leading, font, font size, tab settings etc and not have subscripts and exponents be lost. There is a robust selection of which aspects of the style will be affected when applying a style change. Like many other features, it will take some searching or forum help to find it, but once getting through the learning curve, it’s all good.
Now I’ve just working through some personal printer problems, and getting test prints from local printing services to make sure fonts and graphics all print as intended from different professional services.
For home-office based desktop engineering publishing, Affinity is meeting my needs.
I’m happy to hear that you’re finding that Publisher suits your needs, even for engineering and math. So far I haven’t used it for that kind of material. Your tip about superscripts and subscripts is a good one, too—I wouldn’t have thought of it right away myself. I recently put together a book with lots of special features, styles, and images, and after fumbling around for a while, I got used to it also.
One thing that I find annoying is the method for unlocking master page items. It’s unnecessarily complicated and time-consuming.
And the hitch in the printing dialog bothers me every time, too.
What I dislike most is the lack of a way to name, edit, and delete color swatches. The tiny squares of color in the Swatches dialog box are impossible to tell apart; if I have tried 5 shades of blue to find the best one, all 5 almost-identical swatches sit there just daring me to pick the correct one. Aaargh. Maybe there’s an answer for this in the user forum.
But hey, for the price it’s an amazing application, and I will continue to use it.
Glenna
If you use Affinity Publisher, you may later be into printing and making your own paperback books, if so you may be interested in a book, free to read on line at:
https://issuu.com/jayarkay/docs/a5_bklt_for_pdf__small_V
It combines Four Essays on paperback binding which once appeared on line but now no longer do so.
I have some information on my website about the paperbacks that I produce at home. Most may be read on line at ISSUU.
Best wishes
John
Thank you for the link, I’ll check it out. I don’t expect to invest in the hardware to do my own paperback binding, but I’m sure there is information that will help me format my material to be more publishing friendly if I use a local service to publish.
I would say Photo so far is the furthest along. It is only missing a couple features; live trace and selection by color is rudamentary compared to photoshop. But there are work arounds so these are insignificant. Design on the other hand is missing quite a few more. Design is missing live trace and selection by color as well but also gradient mesh, freeform gradient and envelope distortion which are significant gaps. I have not looked at Publisher yet so thank you for the review. It seems that Publisher is further along than Designer with fewer gaps.
Thanks for your comment, Devin. We haven’t explored Design and Photo as much as Publisher, so your observations will be helpful.
Fiona
Your book “Book Design Made Simple” along with this blog and others were my cornerstone guides for designing and self-publishing my first ever poetry photography book “Stillness: Whispers From Nature”—I chose Affinity Publisher from a cost-perspective, but then learned that it is an amazing software that never disappointed me. With your guidance and videos from Affinity, I created a gorgeous coffee table size hardcover book. I chose offset printing by Friesen. Reviews and testimonials speak for themselves (http:/www.orialivipublishing.com and Goodreads).
I cannot express how indebted I’m to your book and this blog post on Affinity Publisher!
I am currently finishing up my second self-published book (Awareness: Whispers From Nature) leveraging the work learned from the first book. I should be published in March, 2021.
Thank you!
Dear Kent,
Thank you so much for sharing your success with us! We are honored to have been an essential part of your publishing journey. And we are excited to get confirmation from a reader that our book can guide folks who are using Affinity Publisher. We knew it would be the case, but wondered if anyone besides us had tried it.
Best of luck with your second book. We love to help people publish good-looking books.
Glenna
Publisher is an excellent piece of software and its low-cost appeal has been enhanced the recent publication of the Workbook. Its scope goes way beyond core skills to cover design and branding. My copy arrived today and I have hardly put it down. Affinity really has broken the mould.
I am eagerly awaiting my copy!
I’ve just installed Affinity Publisher and was looking at the Workbook on their site. Is it worth the cost? (more than twice the price for the software itself). Also, I found their site confusing as to whether the book is hard copy only or also in pdf.
Hello Sally,
I eagerly bought the Publisher Workbook, thinking it was a user manual. But it is not. It’s one of those books that takes you through lessons so you can learn the program. The lessons are fine as they are, and if you learn well that way, then it would be worth it. I am more of a try-it-but-get-stuck-then-look-it-up kind of person. For that, I use the tutorials instead. Also (are you listening, Affinity?) the index is not good enough. It’s a bit difficult to find exactly the procedure I’m trying to learn.
I do not know if it comes in PDF format. It’s over 500 pages long (and a very heavy book).
I hope this helps. I am still enjoying Publisher. It doesn’t have quite all the features of InDesign, but the price makes it entirely worth it.
Glenna
There is an amazing software that provides answers to writing in right-to-left languages like Hebrew and Arabic:
http://rtlfixer.com/
I have been using it for quite some time and it allows me to work with Affinity software and writing in right-to-left languages. I got to check it out in Photoshop as well and it also works great.
Thank you! That’s very good to know.
Glenna
After your favourable report on Affinity Publisher, would you be thinking possibly of writing a “Book Design Made Simple” centred around the use of Affinity Publisher?
I have been using Serif DesktopPublishing Applications to produce paperback books for thirty years ever since Version 1 of PagePlus and Serif really know their business when it comes to Publishing.
I am only waiting for Publisher to include some of the useful aspects I rely upon in PagePlus such as Footnotes, endnotes and the inclusion of an included text editor before I switch entirely over to Publisher.
Hello John,
How nice to hear from a long-time Serif user! My path to Publisher runs through Pagemaker, Quark XPress, and InDesign. Like you, I’m still waiting for all the little extras to appear before I switch off my other apps completely.
Our book was a huge amount of work (all those screen shots and examples!). But still, if we were about 10 years younger, we would definitely produce an edition of Book Design Made Simple for Publisher. As it is, we have no such plans. We’ve heard that the current book can still be used with Publisher, though.
Glenna
Great to hear your story Glenna, If you want to see some of what I’ve been doing, do look at my ISSUU pages, a good way to get my stuff on line for prospective customers. It doesn’t include all the private family history books I’ve done, but you might find it interesting, most if not all of them are downloadable.
https://issuu.com/johnkay6/docs
https://issuu.com/jayarkay/docs
https://issuu.com/jayarkay/docs/timely_texts_2
John
My experience is very similar, being a 1.0 PagePlus user. It’s no help with the “new company” Affinity, in fact they do their very best to make no concessions whatsoever to old loyalists.
There are a small number of handy features that the Affinity programmes do not have that is irritating and limiting. I think the simple answer is Afinity wanted a new customer base, largely of professional but junior designers.
The lack of an internal text editor in Publisher is a tell-tale that all those writers/editors/designers of parish magazine, school newsletters etc are not wanted on voyage.
That said, the Affinity software is classy, slick and probably easy to pick-up – if you use the Adobe products learned from the day-job.
Hi Paul and John,
Just chiming in here again. It’s true that Publisher is lacking a (very) few features that I used to enjoy in InDesign. I’d like to be able to edit the Assets, for instance, by labeling them and moving them in and out, the way I could in an ID library. And it would be nice to have more options for the way rules look. But for a retired designer who doesn’t want to continue paying up month after month, this is an excellent solution. The price is right for those church and school newsletters.
Glenna
Absolutely. I have been a die-hard customer and purchased every upgrade. I am appalled at the lack of care to address us. The terms are different and based on the responses in the forums by moderators – they have very little interest in doing so.
I had no interest in learning the Adobe suite and now that they have earned all their recognition – I am certain that the loyal Serif base will continue to be ignored.
I like it – but the learning curve is very steep, my hundreds of documents cannot be brought in without converting to PDF and their condescending tone leaves a really bad taste in my mouth.
I’ve been using Affinity products for about 3 years now (I have no Adobe products on either my iMac or MacBook Pro). I never bought into Adobe’s subscription plan so the last version of InDesign and other programs I was using was CS5.5. No problems on my old MacBook Pro which I kept “dumbed-down” with an earlier OS so as to be able to keep using the old software.
I started using Affinity Publisher the moment the Beta version was released and practiced and familiarized myself with it while simultaneously using QuarkXpress (yes, you heard right). Once the official version of Publisher was released I purchased it and began with simple single page layouts and a few magazine spreads. Those worked great without a hitch and those projects were all printed.
Jump ahead to April 2020 and I completed a full 100 page issue, cover-to-cover, of Skin Art Magazine, which I’ve been Art Directing and Designing for 4 years. The process from design to PDF creation to uploading to offset printer and online proofing went smoothly and the issue is available both digitally and print (#174). I’m not trying to sell the magazine (although you’re all welcome to purchase), but, rather, to exclaim my excitement at using all Affinity programs to create a full issue from the ground up. I’m never looking back to Adobe. In the end, no printer wants a native file. It’s all PDF workflow. Anything you create in Affinity products can also be used for digital/web graphics.
As Publisher is new, there are a few features missing but I’m sure they’ll be implemented in the course of time. One semi-minor one is “Column Span” (Ability to have a headline span multiple columns-available in Quark and InDesign). The workaround is the same as I used to do before those features were available: make a separate text box. The other feature that MANY have held up their switching to Publisher from InDesign is a “Data Merge” function. I only bring this up because when I worked at a Print Shop, it was a heavily used feature for bulk mailings, custom invite envelopes, custom postcard mailings, etc. If you have no need for that function, then it shouldn’t affect your decision to purchase Publisher. Further, with bulk mailings, print shops and mailing houses usually prefer to perform that function themselves.
Just my 2-cents.
Hello Danny,
I am excited to read your hearty approval of Publisher. I agree completely and can hardly wait to design my first book, which I will do soon. At the moment I am also using a dumbed-down computer with InDesign 5.5, but that can’t go on forever.
Since I published my review, a couple of readers have pointed out two other things missing from the application: the lack of scripting (I have never used this, so I didn’t think to look for it in Publisher), and the inability to export a file to EPUB format. Now I know about Data Merge also (this is not something a book designer would usually need).
But we are all hopeful that Serif will add these features in the future. In the meantime I am thrilled with the Affinity products.
Thanks for taking the time to write! I am learning all sorts of things from our readers!
Glenna
I have been (slowly) using the Affinity suite over the last 5 years. I eventually dropped the Adobe suite, although I do have the last version of the Master Collection 6.0 installed — but don’t use InDesign or Illustrator anymore since Affinity came around.
I find their suite is continually being improved in terms of features and performance.
As you mentioned you can’t beat the value. Also, I am not sure if you mentioned something in your review; yes, it is a purchase not a subscription, but it is also a lifetime update deal. No more having to purchase upgrades !!
Hi Luis, it’s true you can’t beat the value, and we don’t even have to purchase upgrades! Thanks for clarifying that for our readers. Fiona
Danny, does Affinity convert PDF to PDF/X-1a:2001 or PDF/X-3:2002 for IngramSpark publishing?
From Publisher you can export PDF/X-1a:2003 and PDF/X-3:2003.
I am going to ask IngramSpark if these are acceptable, but it takes them a week to reply. I’ll let you know!
Glenna
Hello again Mill,
IngramSpark replied and said to use “default setting PDF/X-a1:2001.” This is not an option in Publisher, so I’ll write to them again. I hope you have time to be patient on this.
I checked with BookBaby, and they will accept any PDF/X format, so let’s hope.
Glenna
Finally a definitive answer from IngramSpark. Yes, you can use the PDF formats that are produced by Publisher at IngramSpark. Sorry it took so long to come up with an answer to this.
Glenna
Affinity Designer is also missing a HUGE component… SCRIPTING! I rely upon 5-6 scripts to get my books designed.. without scripting support – this is not a viable option to most professionals. I do like the integration of their other products – something sorely missing in Adobe suite of products… I would love to be in Indesign and simply open up illustrator, select an item and hit a button for it to appear in Indesign.. without having to jump through hoops!
Hi there,
Thank you for your comments about Publisher. Somehow I managed a long career in book design without using scripting at all, and we don’t cover it in our book, so I didn’t think to even look for it. Perhaps others will now see your comments and be alerted to this missing element.
You’re right that the tight integration among the 3 products is a real plus.
Glenna
Thank you so much! I’m a complete newbie to design and page-layout software, and you surely just saved me a lot of money. I read through part 3 of your book earlier and opened it up today in preparation for downloading InDesign but thought, oh, I’ll check the blog first. Glad I did!
I figure that since I haven’t invested any time learning InDesign (except reading part of your book), I might as well invest my time in a recommended but less expensive program. Thank you again!
Hello Nancy,
I’m so glad that the timing was right for you! I hope you enjoy learning Publisher (and the other 2 programs as you need them). They are all really excellent. Combining the design concepts and the order of doing the steps in our book plus the methods you can learn from the tutorials and the Help menu, you should be able to produce a professional-quality book.
The discount price is good only through May 20, I believe. If I were you, I’d look at the free trial for a couple of days before putting down any money, just to see if the whole thing seems doable, and then jump in just in time to get the good deal.
Good luck!
Glenna
Thanks, Glenna! I already did purchase the 3 programs–the price seems unbeatable!
And I already created a document and placed my book text into it (it’s so exciting!). You are correct that your book is still tremendously helpful even with a different program. I’m like, “How come only page 1 is here?” but then I remembered something about “flowing” from your book, so I was able to figure it out quickly. Your excellent book will be by my side as I continue through the whole process!
I hired a professional designer to lay out my first book, but I wasn’t totally happy with the result (not her fault), and I can’t afford to pay someone again. I love having complete control and look forward to the challenge of learning the whole process myself. I don’t have professional training in layout and design, but besides a (long-ago) background in typesetting and copyediting, I have a great deal of patience!
Thanks again,
Nancy
Hi again Nancy,
This is wonderful news, so thanks for sharing it. I hope your experience will encourage others who are in the same situation. And it’s great to have it confirmed that our book can help you get through the design and layout process even using a different layout program. (Luckily for us all, they use very similar methods to get to the same destination.)
So good luck and enjoy the process. If you run into trouble along the way, just write to us again.
Glenna
Very intriguing Glenna, looks like it’s well worth checking out so thanks for the review. This could also be a big help to the many folks who might want to do their own high-quality books, but can’t afford InDesign. I’m curious whether the text variables will import without any intervention since we have so many embedded in our book files.
Hi Joel,
Hi Joel,
Thanks for your question about transferring text variables from InDesign templates to Publisher. I tried a simple experiment, and unfortunately the variables did not work in Publisher after the transfer. However, one of your tech-savvy colleagues might be able to finagle something.
I do recommend trying Publisher, at least the 90-day trial version. I really like it and once my cranky old computer dies and I don’t have access to InDesign any more, I will be very happy to use Publisher exclusively. The other 2 programs, Photo and Designer, are equally good.
Glenna